I really like the variety of brickwork on this building, which varies from under-window to adorning the chimney on the eastern face (sunny) face. At the corner you can see that the building is one of a set and has several relatives adjacent and across Amsterdam.
Archive for March, 2009
The entrance archway here caught my eye. Although partially obscured by the fire escape, one can see the interesting proportions in the arch, the tall ledges, pilasters, and the frieze capping it. Note adjacent to the entrance the shoddily removed decorative windows.
At the top corner of the building, I found the superfluous pilaster rather interesting; what caused its addition? Why does it have the shabby offshoot? And why is there a picket fence, of all types, on the roof?
Added: March 27, 2009
There are a few buildings, particularly on Amsterdam Avenue, which can only be described as gaunt and undecorated, yet are highly ornamented at points.
The towers on this building appear to mimic those on Central Park West (in particular the El Dorado), but these are actually water towers! Nonetheless, the art deco styling subtly turns a potentially bland and overbuilt facade into something majestic.
Although this was a very well known building, its destruction is even better-known; see this post on my personal blog for historical quotes on the progression of the demolition and the public outcry.
Although this building was built in 1925, it did not become a Sofia Storage location until 1950. It was originally constructed for the Metropolitan Fireproof Warehouse Company, but Sofia bought it when Metropolitan went under.
Added: March 15, 2009
I like the fan-like lintels as well as the heavy arches on the top windows; the heavy relief (or what appears to be relief in this light) gives a great character. I venture so far as to say the missing cornice enhances the effect.
The water tower and parapet are among the most decorated parts of this building. However, that is partly the result of lazy repair work done to remove the cornice (clearly visible at the bottom of the picture by the thick light brick line). One has to wonder whether anything other than style motivated the decoration so far removed from the street.
One thing that has caught my attention about buildings is the extensions.This is a good example, and an easy one to spot; they clearly added an extra three stories in a different color without extending the stone lintel pattersn. However, it also seems they added an extra story before that; why else is there a thick white line ringing the building but the remnant of the original cornice?
This is an unassuming building with some great detail, shown here. Note the lion and human faces in the corbels; what do they represent?














