As an aside, why can’t the Nvidia linux driver do Twinview for my two graphics card (Nvidia 6500 and 8500GT)? Windows can!

One thing he introduces in chapter 9 tangentially is the “system.time” function; feed it a code block, and it will tell you the amount of real and system time elapsed. So, it is the perfect test bench for which of two methods runs faster; he uses it to show you how you get a 4x speedup using the built-in “colSum” function over “apply”. Using vectorization, a loop is just as fast as “apply”, however without vectorization, you get a 60x slowdown using element-by-element looping.

This points to the key to R-speed: don’t lie to R. Tell it everything, so that it can allocate memory efficiently, which is by far your slowest task. Take this example for applying “rbind” across a set of data frames. Previously, I had thought “functional programming”, and naturally went with “Reduce”. However, this book motivated me to find the “do.call” solution. Observe the results.

> df <- lapply( 1:1000, function(z) data.frame( runif(1000 )))
> system.time( a <- do.call( cbind, df ))
 user  system elapsed
 0.54    0.01    0.59
> system.time( b <- Reduce( cbind, df ))
 user  system elapsed
 40.16    0.80   42.61

That’s right, the “Reduce” method took 80x longer than the “do.call” method. I am going to change some of my code right now…

Here are the changes as of WP 2.8.

In “general-template.php”, locate the lines that say

$after = ' ('.$arcresult->posts.')' . $afterafter;

and change them to

$text .= <...>

There are a number of such lines, so this will make them all consistent. I think I counted 4 such changes.

The other change to make is in “classes.php”.  Break line 1336 (which looked something like this before I got to it)

$link .= $cat_name . "</a>";

So that it becomes

$link .= $cat_name;
$link .= "</a>";

Now move up this block between those two lines:

if ( isset($show_count) && $show_count )
 $link .= ' (' . intval($category->count) . ')';

This will change your formatting slightly if you were using the feed code, and I don’t have a good answer for you on that.

I only discovered it a few months ago when looking over my brother’s shoulder. “Wha’s Zotero?” When he explained it to me, I remarked “that seems pretty useless to me. I don’t plan on writing research papers anytime soon.” However, I have found that it is an excellent organization tool for any type of research you do; I just ignore all of the citation stuff.

I have been using it to organize anything with information, particularly as a part of my research. Say that I am programming in python, and I look up different solutions for communicating with excel. There are several packages out there with a number of pages of interest (not all readily discoverable), and documents on the subject.  Furthermore, as I learn more about each solution, I will want to record my discoveries for the future so in 2 months I will be able to remind myself the features and limitations of each product, as applied to my problem. This is easy in Zotero; just see the following screenshot.

Example zotero file in the course of python research

Admittedly, I imported earlier research into Zotero in this case, so it’s not the greatest example. However, you can see I made use of tags (the Python filter has more than just those files tagged with excel) Each of my “bookmarks” is actually a little folder (perhaps documents stapled together) in which I can store related items and tag them all as a group. Notes and other files can go in each bookmark, and they can exist in several folders simultaneously.

There are lots of other features I don’t use, but I can’t recommend it more highly if you ever find yourself researching a topic. Old-fashined bookmarks are a lot of work to organize, and you end up just dumping the in a pile most of the time. The structure here is incredibly easy to create and maintain; making use of only a few of the features should make finding things very easy – just hit “add” button, type a couple tags, maybe a note and move on!

My solution to this problem in the original version, written and debugged in Excel 2003, was to have those summary cells reference the range A23:A65536 and take a count, etc. to get the number or summary of those cells. This was fine. My code would take 30 seconds per run, most of which I thought was spent in VBA.

Enter Excel 2007. On a whim, I saved my spreadsheet in 2007 format and ran it. It was slow. I mean, mind bogglingly slow. I thought it was just the network taking a long time to download the data, however my coworker ran it a few times and it locked up his computer. Then it dawned on me: the formulas were rewritten to now reference A23:A1048576. Excel was  touching 1 million rows over and over again every time the sheet calculated, which was often (he was using an RTD link, so it recalculated constantly). A simple solution: write a UDF that would count excatly the size of my data array, and use that instead.

This was the surprise: since I only had about 1,000 data points (but I didn’t want to hardcode to that number, and so I referenced all rows on the sheet), my running time, even using Excel 2003, went down from 30 seconds to about 6 seconds. The original slowness I had mostly chalked up to Excel handling data poorly; instead, it was purely a function of my forcing it to handle the data poorly, a problem only exposed by migrating to a higher-throughput device. The moral of the story is that if it doesn’t scale, it may be your fault, not theirs.

Now for the inevitable problem: my computer is loud and it’s a waste of energy and a distraction to turn it on to listen to music. The solution: listen to Pandora on a stand-alone device. As a secondary requirement, I wanted a device with an iPod dock, since I have felt a similar problem with not being able to listen to the iPod.

The only device I found out there was the Grace Digital Audio IR3020. It has quite a bit more features than my basic requirements; it plays Sirius radio over the internet (with a subscription), Pandora, iPod, any of a number of streams (podcasts, terrestrial radio over the internet), and music files shared over your local network. You can also set an alarm clock and a sleep timer. It has a remote, and you can set 99 presets (haven’t explored that feature).

Out of curiosity and interest, I have tested most of those features, except for the podcasts (although I’m checking it out now), and the Sirius. Here are some thoughts on each of them and the device.

• Pandora. Works as advertised. All your stations show up in a list, and you bookmark, thumbs up or down, and skip tracks. The Quickmix is available, but you can’t select which stations go into the quickmix (I’m not sure if your configuration from the website holds over.) The big downside is the remote is completely ineffective for this. They don’t have the “Reply” button on the remote, and so you can’t give feedback or skip tracks.
• iPod. You can navigate with the iPod wheel to pick music as usual. Similar to Pandora, you can’t really control the iPod with the remote. Shockingly, I couldn’t even change tracks; I could fast forward and pause. Unlike the radio stations, you can’t set iPod as a preset, so you have to be able to see the screen to play the iPod.
• Streaming Radio. Thousands of stations from around the world are available to stream, and you can add them to your player through the website. This web-config option is one of the coolest things. Change a setting on the internet, and the option appears on the player. This doesn’t have many controls, so there’s nothing the remote can’t do.
• Network Music. I actually did not expect this feature; it can play music from a Windows share, as well as from a Universal Plug’n'Play server. I haven’t been able to get the former to work (very frustrating!), but Windows Media Player 11 sets up the latter with ease, and if my computer is on, I can access my entire library through the radio. And to really placate me, it allows you to navigate through your music either by artist, etc. according to the ID3 tags, or through the filesystem. I am really organized, so the latter is generally a very good choice for me. If you have a home media server, this would be a really sweet feature.
• In general, the interface is very poor.  I have harped on how the remote doesn’t really do anything. The turn-wheel on the front of the player, used to navigate menus and make selections, has so much resistance that when you try to push it, you slide the radio across the table. The screen is too small for its functionality–showing only 3 lines of information and a line of status–so you are constantly scrolling and discovering easter eggs because you didn’t know certain menu items exist!
• It has both an ethernet jack and a wireless b/g antenna. It was a little annoying entering the 16-digit (or however long) key for the router in there using the scroll wheel, but it was a one-time exercise. One cool thing is that it sets the time automatically when you get online, so it pays you back in effort right there.
• For completeness, I’ll tell you that it (apparently) has 2 20-watt speakers, RCA and headphone out. The equalizer has a half-dozen presets.

Overall, it is a very good device. It meets your needs, but on its terms. That, of course, is the story of consumer electronics.

You don’t get the Linksys interface this way, but the built-in windows software works as well as I recall linksys working; I am getting a signal from 3 stories down and 30 linear feet away.

To use the script in Linux, note that you have to change a few lines to manually input your dropbox.db file loation (since the APPDATA variable will not be set). Also, when entering your new dropbox location, don’t use a trailing slash. It worked perfectly for me; now I have Windows and Linux syncing from the same directory!

I just started using the software to collaborate on files, and found that it behaves very funny. In particular, when you open an excel (or other MS Office file), Dropbox does not sync the file to the server until after you close it. Furthermore, if a person opens an excel file, even if they make no changes, dropbox will mark the file as changed and potentially create a conflict.

The solution, according to this forum post is to mark your spreadsheets as collaboration. As a result, excel doesn’t lock the files, so saves will be synced automatically, and changes will be merged across files. (And presumably, changes will also be updated as you work on them, but I’m not sure how that works).

I haven’t tried this yet, but I will follow up in a few days once I have had a chance to look at it. I can see that dropbox may still get confused as two people are editing the same file (particularly macros, which don’t like to change once you have opened a file), but I think MS has probably conquered this problem by now.

1. Right click on the formatting toolbar and go to “Customize”.
2. Right click on the toolbar button you want to assign a hotkey to (in our case, Decrease or Increase Decimal)
3. If you want to make the hotkey “Alt-/” then change the text in the Name box to “&/”. If you have an “opposite” function, for example the opposite of Decrease Decimal is Increase Decimal, then this automatically makes Alt-Shift-/ perform that opposite.
4. Change the button style to “Image and Text”.  (If you want to disable your hotkey, you can change this back to Image only.)
5. Close the Customize window, and you’re done!

(Adapted from Bankers Ball link above.)